Effectiveness and Safety of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Versus Lumboperitoneal Shunt for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure. Although several mechanisms have been proposed as underlying causes of IIH, no identifiable causative factor has been determined for this condition. Initial treatments focus on weight or CSF reduction, but severe cases may require surgery. This study compares outcomes in IIH patients treated with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs). METHODS: This systematic-review and meta-analysis follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and includes studies about VPS and LPS patients, reporting one of the outcomes of interest. We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Our analysis involved twelve studies, comprising 5990 patients. The estimated odds ratio (OR) for visual improvement was 0.97 (95% CI 0.26-3.62; I2 = 0%) and for headache improvement was 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.81; I2 = 0%), favoring LPS over VPS. Shunt revision analysis revealed an OR of 1.53 (95% CI 0.97-2.41; I2 = 77%). The shunt complications showed an OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.68-1.22; I2 = 0%). The sub-analyses for shunt failure uncovered an OR of 1.41 (95% CI 0.92-2.18; I2 = 25%) and for shunt infection events an OR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.50-1.75; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The interventions showed general equivalence in complications, shunt failure, and other outcomes, but LPS seems to hold an advantage in improving headaches. Substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for more conclusive evidence, emphasizing the crucial role for further studies. The findings underscore the importance of considering a tailored decision between VPS and LPS for the management of IIH patients.

The rule of five: A novel anatomical landmark for approaching cavernous sinus content.

Background: The main objective of this study is to enhance neurosurgeons' anatomical knowledge by providing specific anatomical references of the cavernous sinus (CS). However, it is essential to clarify that our study does not seek to establish an absolute intraoperative rule due to the inherent anatomical variability that must be considered. Methods: Fifty-three cadaveric specimens were procured from the Forensic Institute (Bogotá) and subjected to dissection through an extradural approach. The measurements were taken in two distinct phases. The first phase involved the measurement of various anatomical structures in 25 specimens with respect to the anterior and posterior clinoids. The second phase, which was conducted 5 years later, involved the measurement of the distance between the foramen rotundum and the foramen ovale in 28 specimens using the L&W tools microcaliper. Results: In 25 specimens, a perpendicular imaginary line was drawn from the lateral tip of the anterior clinoid to the floor of the medial fossa. This facilitated access to the Parkinson's triangle, which is located between the IV cranial nerve and the ophthalmic V1 nerve, revealing a constant distance of 5 mm between the lateral tip of the anterior clinoid and the IV cranial nerve. Furthermore, in 28 specimens, the mean distance from the foramen rotundum to the foramen ovale was found to be 1.3 cm bilaterally. Conclusion: The rule of five is a valuable tool for comprehensively understanding the anatomy of the CS, providing a reference point for the different normal anatomical structures within the CS.